Original Research - Special Collection: Framing and modelling disaster risk

Reflections on a vulnerability framework for sustainability science

Billie L. Turner II, Bing-Bing Zhou
Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies | Vol 15, No 1 | a1335 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v15i1.1335 | © 2023 B.L. Turner II, Bing-Bing Zhou | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 28 April 2022 | Published: 26 July 2023

About the author(s)

Billie L. Turner II, School of Geographical Science & Urban Planning, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe and School of Sustainability, College of Global Futures, Arizona State University, Tempe, United States
Bing-Bing Zhou, School of International Affairs & Public Administration, Ocean University of China, Qingdao; and Key Laboratory of Coastal Science and Integrated Management, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao, China

Abstract

The first vulnerability framework for sustainability science was published about two decades ago. It embedded vulnerability analysis into the foundational lens of sustainability and resilience research – the social-environmental system (SES) – and called for an integration of the vulnerabilities of the social and environmental subsystems as opposed to the dominating attention given at the time to societal vulnerability. The framework recognised that the environment itself is vulnerable to disturbances and that the interactions of the two subsystems create a system-wide vulnerability central to questions of sustainability or sustainable development. It also provided multiple components of analysis that should be considered if vulnerability research and assessments were to contribute more fully to sustainability themes. Using bibliometric analysis and attention to subsequent vulnerability publications, various impacts of this original framework on vulnerability studies were examined in the study, including its recognition by citations, citation pathways and fields of study, and the degree to which its various dimensions were employed. It was found that its large citation recognition was not necessarily matched by attention to the dimensions the framework proposed, noting several exceptions.

Contribution: The authors interpreted this discrepancy to have followed from the analytical complexity fostered by the framework and to the significant proportion of vulnerability interests that was and remains focused on societal vulnerability as opposed to the social-environmental one, even in this moment in which sustainability in the Anthropocene has become a paramount query.


Keywords

sustainability science; vulnerability; new millennium; resilience; social-environment.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3731
Total article views: 7717

 

Crossref Citations

1. The impact of high-standard farmland construction policy on disaster vulnerability of food production systems: evidence from China
Zeng Wei, Jiaxi Zheng, Jingyu Zhang, Jiquan Peng, Xufeng Cui, Qingnan You
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems  vol: 9  year: 2025  
doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1673265

2. Participatory analysis of disaster risk creation in Brazilian coastal cities: bridging remote sensing and citizen generated data
Aloísio Lélis de Paula, Victor Marchezini, Tatiana Sussel Gonçalves Mendes
International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment  vol: 16  issue: 3  first page: 378  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2023-0013

3. Geography and climate vulnerabilities
Diana Liverman
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers  vol: 49  issue: 4  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1111/tran.12721

4. Shaping tomorrow: Global patterns in youth environmental engagement
Lyudmyla Tsykalova
The Journal of Environmental Education  vol: 56  issue: 5  first page: 349  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1080/00958964.2025.2498896

5. Supporting sustainable mangrove management in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: An application of the Environment-Vulnerability-Decision-Technology systems engineering framework
Jack Reid, Danielle Wood
Acta Astronautica  vol: 238  first page: 112  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.08.050

6. Solar energy integration in heritage buildings: A case study of St. Nicholas Church
Hirou Karimi, Mohammad Anvar Adibhesami, Siamak Hoseinzadeh, Sahar Movafagh, Bonin Mahdavi Estalkhsari, Davide Astiaso Garcia
Energy Reports  vol: 11  first page: 4177  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2024.03.043

7. A VSD-based framework for assessing climate justice in urban outdoor cooling spaces: a case study of Fuzhou, China
Fengxiao Cao, Yimeng Zhou, Yu Luo, Yuming Shang, Jinsu Yang, Di Yang
Frontiers in Public Health  vol: 13  year: 2025  
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1724719