Bangladesh shares a common border with India in the west, north and east and with Myanmar in the southeast. These borders cut across 57 rivers that discharge through Bangladesh into the Bay of Bengal in the south. The upstream courses of these rivers traverse India, China, Nepal and Bhutan. Transboundary flows are the important sources of water resources in Bangladesh. Among the 57 transboundary rivers, the Teesta is the fourth major river in Bangladesh after the Ganges, the Brahmaputra and the Meghna and Bangladesh occupies about 2071 km2. The Teesta River floodplain in Bangladesh accounts for 14% of the total cropped area and 9.15 million people of the country. The objective of this study was to investigate trends in both maximum and minimum water flow at Kaunia and Dalia stations for the Teesta River and the coping strategies developed by the communities to adjust with uncertain flood situations. The flow characteristics of the Teesta were analysed by calculating monthly maximum and minimum water levels and discharges from 1985 to 2006. Discharge of the Teesta over the last 22 years has been decreasing. Extreme low-flow conditions were likely to occur more frequently after the implementation of the Gozoldoba Barrage by India. However, a very sharp decrease in peak flows was also observed albeit unexpected high discharge in 1988, 1989, 1991, 1997, 1999 and 2004 with some in between April and October. Onrush of water causes frequent flash floods, whereas decreasing flow leaves the areas dependent on the Teesta vulnerable to droughts. Both these extreme situations had a negative impact on the lives and livelihoods of people dependent on the Teesta. Over the years, people have developed several risk mitigation strategies to adjust with both natural and anthropogenic flood situations. This article proposed the concept of ‘MAXIN (maximum and minimum) flows’ for river water justice for riparian land.
The Teesta River is the fourth major transboundary river of Bangladesh, located in the northwest region of the country. Actually, it originates in Chitamu Lake in the Sikkim Himalayas at an altitude of about 7200 m and comes down first to the Darjeeling plain and then to the Duars plain of West Bengal in India (Banglapedia
The Teesta is a major transboundary river that travels through highlands in Sikkim, the hills of West Bengal and the floodplains of West Bengal (India) and Bangladesh. The river has a length of 414 km, drains an area of around 12 159 km2 (Alford
The Teesta is flowing through the five northern districts of Bangladesh (Gaibandha, Kurigram, Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari and Rangpur districts of Rangpur Division), comprising 35 upazilas and 5427 villages, with an estimated population of 9.15 million in 2011 (Prasai & Surie
Most of Bangladesh lies within the catchment area of the Ganges, the Brahmaputra, and the Meghna rivers which mainly drain through Bangladesh into the Bay of Bengal (Brammer
The objective of this research was to investigate the trends of both maximum and minimum flow for the Teesta River in Bangladesh and variance in flow pattern because of the withdrawal and sudden release of water by India through the Gozoldoba Barrage and to identify risk-reduction strategies developed by the communities to cope with uncertain flood situations.
The chronological records of stages and discharges of Bangladesh’s rivers are scanty. The flow characteristics of the Teesta River were analysed by calculating monthly maximum and minimum water levels and discharges from 1985 to 2006. Historical hydrological data of Kaunia and Dalia stations were collected from BWDB. All these data were then analysed by plotting graph with Microsoft Office Excel package and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to visualise the temporal changes in monthly maximum and minimum discharge and water level. The variability of maximum and minimum monthly and yearly discharge at Kaunia and Dalia stations was shown through box-and-whisker plots in SPSS environment. The horizontal line across the box stands for the median flow while the bottom and top edges of the box mark the first and third quartiles, respectively. The crosses beyond the whiskers indicate high and low outliers. To identify the risk-reduction strategies, a field survey was conducted along the banks of the Teesta River in Bangladesh. The study was conducted in Kaunia upazila and Gangachara upazila of Rangpur district and Hatibandha and Kaliganj upazila of Lalmonirhat district. The data were collected through 26 structured questionnaires, 3 focus group discussions and 2 in-depth interviews with respondents.
Historical maximum and minimum discharge data of the Teesta River at Kaunia and Dalia stations from 1985 to 2006 were analysed to understand the temporal variation of maximum and minimum flow. Analyses of historical discharge data from 1985 to 2006 at Kaunia station showed that the volume of water rises after March and reaches its peak in April as shown in
Monthly (a) maximum discharge and (b) minimum discharge at Kaunia from 1985 to 2006.
Monthly (a) maximum discharge and (b) minimum discharge at Dalia from 1985 to 2006.
On the contrary, at Dalia station, the flow of water increased from mid-May and continued till mid-September with a rapid recession from mid-September and reached the least in January, February and March as shown in
Irregularities were also observed in the Teesta River flow. The maximum line showed a fluctuating tendency and hit the highest point (8577 m3/sec) on 21 April 2004 as shown in
Yearly recorded monthly maximum discharge at Kaunia station from 1985 to 2006.
Yearly recorded minimum discharge at Kaunia station from 1985 to 2006.
Minimum monthly discharge at Kaunia station during December to April from 1997 to 2006 never crossed 100 m3/sec, while maximum discharge below 50 m3/sec was observed during January–March from 1999 to 2006 (except 2000 and 2004) and below 100 m3/sec from 1998 to 2006 (except 2004) during December–March (
Box plot of year-wise recorded (a) maximum discharge and (b) minimum discharge at Kaunia station from 1985 to 2006.
Year-wise maximum and minimum discharge from the Teesta River at Kaunia station is shown in
Bangladesh established a barrage on the Teesta at Dalia-Doani point in Lalmonirhat district 1990. From the records available since 1985, Dalia station had its minimum flow of 0.05 m3/sec on 24 November 1987. On the contrary, the discharge at Dalia station attained its peak of 5294.21 m3/sec on 10 July 2003 (
Yearly recorded maximum discharge at Dalia Station from 1985 to 2006.
Yearly recorded minimum discharge at Dalia station from 1985 to 2006.
During the period 1985–2006, mean maximum and minimum discharges were 782.61 m3/sec and 343.02 m3/sec, respectively, as shown in
Box plot of year-wise recorded (a) maximum and (b) minimum discharge at Dalia station from 1985 to 2006.
With the increase in the discharge of the rivers, it is only normal that water levels will also rise, although the highest discharge and the highest stage may not always be coincident in date, because of various factors (river width, river depth, topography, velocity of flow, sedimentation behaviour of river and so on) that interfere with the behaviour of rivers. However, the general pattern of rise and fall of water discharges and those of water levels closely resemble each other. The general picture of the changing level of water over some years is described herein.
The monthly maximum and minimum water levels at Kaunia station from November to March (1985–2006) never crossed the danger level as observed from
Monthly recorded maximum and minimum water level at Kaunia station from 1985 to 2006.
From the recorded data since 1985–2006 at the Kaunia station, it was observed that the maximum stage graph line showed a fluctuating tendency between 1985 and 1996 and within this period, the water level crossed the linear line six times (
Yearly recorded maximum and minimum water level at Kaunia Station from 1985 to 2006.
The stage of water at Dalia station increased from April and continued till August, after which the water level decreased as found in
Monthly recorded maximum and minimum water level at Dalia station from 1985 to 2006.
Since 1985, the water level at Dalia station exceeded danger level 10 times (
Yearly recorded minimum water level at Dalia station from 1985 to 2006.
The danger level of the Teesta River at Dalia station was changed because of the excessive sedimentation on the riverbed. One of the strong arguments for this excessive sedimentation was the construction of two barrages over the Teesta River–Gozoldoba Barrage (India) as well as the Teesta Barrage (Bangladesh). The Teesta is mighty and flashy in nature and India withdraws Teesta water during the dry season through Gozoldoba Barrage. Excessive control of water at Gozoldoba made the Teesta sluggish during the dry season. As a result, massive sedimentation occurred each year which in turn resulted in the changes of danger level from 52.15 m PWD (up to 2007) to 52.4 m PWD (in 2008) by the BWDB. This indicated the aggradation of sediments because of the construction of the barrages.
The Teesta River flow is very crucial for Bangladesh. It determines the fortune of Teesta-dependent inhabitants. Upstream diversion of water (from Gozoldoba point) during the dry season causes water scarcity, droughts and seriously hampers irrigation; sudden release of water during the rainy season causes floods, river bank erosion and damage to crops in the northern part of Bangladesh. This research found drastic reduction in flow in the dry season from 1985 to 2006. Reduction in dry season flow has seriously been affecting irrigation, during the
Map of the study area.
In general, the Teesta River is mighty and flashy in nature. People who are residing along the banks of this river generated coping strategies to adjust to its behaviour. But unpredictable flow pattern over the last two decades have left the inhabitants in a more risky situation than the pre-Gozoldoba Barrage period. Almost all the respondents fall within the low-income category with monthly income less than BDT 4000 (1 USD = BDT 80). However, one-fourth of the respondents worked as
All the respondents identified the Teesta River flood as both natural (overflow of river banks) and human-made (sudden release of water from the upstream). Actually, sudden release of huge volumes of water from the reservoir was the main reason for uncertain floods in their locality in recent decades. Every respondent had experienced floods almost every year in their lifetime but the severity and extension of floods varied with respondents and location of houses from the river. To discover the coping strategies and livelihood measures in a flood, respondents were asked about the duration and extension of flood stage. Actually, topography determines the duration and extension of flood level in the study area. People from
Uncertain floods did cause immense damage to the lives and livelihoods of the inhabitants.
To cope with these adverse uncertain floods situation, people developed some risk-reduction strategies that are discussed in the flowing sections.
All the respondents had to leave their houses during floods as their houses were submerged in flood water. They took shelter on embankments, roads or nearby schools. Respondents hardly took refuge in the flood shelter centres for various reasons such as flood shelter centres being located in distant places, no separate place for women, inadequate facilities among others.
Flood insurance is not available in Bangladesh and usually people are forced to seek immediate help from sources available to them during or after the occurrence of floods. Almost all the respondents hardly get external support in such a situation. Majority of the respondents relied on their relatives for help during a crisis. Sources of help from local administration or government and non-government organisations (NGOs) were too meagre. It was interesting that most of the respondents depended on their own resources or savings.
The post-flood agricultural rehabilitation was very crucial for the respondents. As soon as the floodwater starts receding, respondents who have family connections on high land look for seedbed there, if available, for sowing seeds. Respondents also searched for assistance or loans from NGOs for cultivation. Almost half of the respondents took loans from the
This research made an interesting finding that at present people are more responsive to floods than earlier. Respondents have taken different short-term and long-term measures to cope with recurrent uncertain floods. Almost every respondent either raised the plinth of their homestead or strengthened their house with strong materials (such as bricks, corrugated iron roofs, woods) or both. Some respondents have started to generate savings at the family level or at local NGOs to face the crisis during or after floods. Around half of the respondents have engaged in backyard poultry rearing to get hard cash during the crisis period. The respondents could sell out their chickens at the onset of floods. It helps them enormously before or after the floods, whereas the ducks sell out at a later period of flood as they can survive even in water. However, some of the respondents are incapable of saving or taking any other necessary steps. But they have knowledge of coping strategies. Respondents (80%) also received capacity development trainings on risk reduction and coping strategies from government and development organisations. These trainings include agricultural risk management (selecting flood- or drought-resistant crop varieties), adjustment of seasonal crop calendars, income-generating activities for women, capacity development of women on flood preparedness at family level (such as food preservation) and so on.
The analysis was based on the recorded discharge and water level of the Teesta River at Kaunia (located about 70 km downstream of the Teesta Barrage at Dalia) and Dalia stations. The analyses showed that substantial reduction of maximum and minimum discharge had taken place in both stations, especially in the recent past from the year 1990, that resulted in an alarming situation in the downstream part of the Teesta. Reduction in dry season flow may have significant socioeconomic impacts downstream by altering the hydrological pattern and accelerated sedimentation, which in turn affect livelihoods of local communities. The flow of the Teesta is closely associated with the agriculture and livelihoods of the northern region of Bangladesh. It is evident from the above analysis that the variation of flow within the year was disproportionate; however, considerable amount of flow reduction has taken place, especially in the recent past for dry and wet seasons.
From 1997 to 2006, the maximum water level at Kaunia station never crossed the danger level and the maximum value showed a decreasing tendency. On the contrary, at Dalia station, minimum water level had been decreasing sharply since 1991. The maximum water level was also decreasing with few fluctuations. Probably, these fluctuations result from excessive sedimentation in the riverbed. The Teesta Riverbed is being aggradated at a rate of 100 mm per year upstream of the barrage since its construction (Khan & Hossain
The analyses set out above designate that the diversion of water from the Gozoldoba Barrage has caused noteworthy changes in the dry season discharge (November–March) of the Teesta River in Bangladesh. However, the sudden release of excess water from the Gozoldoba Barrage caused severe losses to the people. Thus, reduced flow in the dry season and the sudden release of water has potentially wide-ranging socioeconomic and environmental implications for Bangladesh. Because the Teesta is a transboundary river between India and Bangladesh, water sharing is a crucial issue.
Recurrence of floods in the Teesta River is no mean problem for the respondents. They perceived floods as both a natural and human-made phenomena, but in many cases they believed flood to be the ‘will of God’. Therefore, they are not afraid of floods as this is a common and regular phenomenon almost every year in their locality. But respondents are scared of uncertain huge flows from the Teesta released from the Gozoldoba Barrage.
Results from this research will provide basic but crucial information to the researchers and policy makers for effective and sustainable management of the Teesta River catchment in lower riparian-Bangladesh. In conclusion, it is to be said that this research might act as a helping tool while discussing Teesta water sharing issues by introducing a new concept of ‘MAXIN (maximum and minimum) river water justice for riparian’. The gross discharge over a year through a river may be the same, but it is a serious issue as to whether this water is equally distributed over the year or not. Thus, a legally binding agreement should be executed wherein India should discuss with Bangladesh before releasing huge amounts of water owing to unexpected melting of snow or excessive rainfall in the upper catchment area. In addition, the gap between maximum and minimum discharge through the Teesta should be as low as possible to maintain the ecological health of the river and prioritise the intrinsic value of the river.
The authors wish to thank BWDB, Dhaka, and BWDB, Northern Zone, Rangpur, BBS and the Teesta Barrage Project personnel (especially Mr Asfat and Mr Fazlu) for their kind cooperation and responsive mind in providing data and information for this study. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their very constructive suggestions and comments to improve the article.
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
M.S.H.M. designed the study and produced the outputs. Both authors analysed the results and wrote the article together.