Original Research - Special Collection: SASDiR 5th Biennial Conference Edition

Statutory and policy-based eco-disaster risk reduction in SADC member states

Alfredo A. Covele, Dewald van Niekerk, Dirk Cilliers
Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies | Vol 16, No 2 | a1799 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1799 | © 2024 Alfredo A. Covele, Dewald van Niekerk, Dirk Cilliers | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 05 September 2024 | Published: 30 October 2024

About the author(s)

Alfredo A. Covele, African Centre for Disaster Studies, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; and Department of Electrotech, Faculty of Engineer, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique
Dewald van Niekerk, African Centre for Disaster Studies, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Dirk Cilliers, Department of Geo- and Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Abstract

Effective legislative framework is the cornerstone of managing hazards and disasters because they have become policy problems of global and local concern. This research study aims at understanding the implementation, strengths and gaps of policies related to Eco-DRR in SADC member states. In particular, attempts to critically analyse the making of DRM policies, as well as the variables underpinning these policies, given the high level of disaster losses. A literature survey was conducted to contextualise and conceptualise statutory and policy-based Eco-DRR. Academic literature on Eco-DRR and related policies, journal articles and related policies, official documents in SADC states including policies, acts, legislations, strategies, frameworks and plans were consulted. The analysis revealed that the Eco-DRR approaches have not yet been mainstreamed as part of standards of DRM in most of SADC member states, opting largely on ad hoc practice. Short-term plans and/or strategies don’t help to articulate funding and programme priorities. In addition, irregular updating of policies in some member states and a lack of following up mechanisms were noted.

Contribution: To change this reality, it is necessary to include Eco-DRR in strategies and/or plans and to standardise ecosystem-based measures for reducing disaster risks. Additionally, there is an urgent need for empowerment of the existing institutions and creation of networks that are driven by SADC institutions. Overall, it is evident that there is a regional interest and demand to apply and standardise ecosystem-based approaches and natural or green infrastructure solutions toward Eco-DRR.


Keywords

disasters risk; disaster risk reduction; policies; SADC; Eco-DRR

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities

Metrics

Total abstract views: 337
Total article views: 714


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.