Original Research

Evaluation of disaster safe education unit programme implementation in Mt. Merapi using the pressure state response approach

Puspita I. Wardhani, Muhammad Musiyam, Yunus A. Wibowo, Aries Dwi W. Rahmadana, Sri Utami, Edwin Maulana
Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies | Vol 16, No 1 | a1769 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1769 | © 2024 Puspita I. Wardhani, Muhammad Musiyam, Yunus A. Wibowo, Aries Dwi W. Rahmadana, Sri Utami, Edwin Maulana | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 01 August 2024 | Published: 29 November 2024

About the author(s)

Puspita I. Wardhani, Department of Geography Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Indonesia
Muhammad Musiyam, Department of Geography Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Indonesia
Yunus A. Wibowo, Department of Geography Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Sukoharjo, Indonesia
Aries Dwi W. Rahmadana, CV Geo Art Science, Sleman; and Department of Geographic Information System, Universitas Maha Karya Asia, Sleman, Indonesia
Sri Utami, Centre for Disaster Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Indonesia
Edwin Maulana, Department of Environmental Science, The Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Indonesia

Abstract

Disaster Safe Education Unit (SPAB), also known globally as Comprehensive Safe School (CSS), aims to improve school residents’ resilience. Three pillars of SPAB have been established, but their implementation, to date, has not shown satisfactory results. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the SPAB programme in the disaster-prone area (KRB) of Merapi Vulcano in Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Data collection was conducted using a field survey combined with in-depth interviews. Overall, the study focussed on the 32 schools in the KRB Merapi. The SPAB implementation was evaluated by considering the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) indicator. The study results showed that not all schools in KRB Merapi implemented the SPAB programme. Safe schools have not fully implemented the three pillars of SPAB. Pillar 3 had the highest rate (96.40%) of implementation in safe schools, whereas Pillar 1 had the lowest (54.5%). Legality, funding and human resources are the critical plausible explanations for why the SPAB pillars have not been implemented well. These problems affect school infrastructure, the capacity of educators, consistency and school motivation in implementing SPAB programme.

Contribution: The response to overcome these issues is strengthening regulations related to SPAB implementation. Strong regulations will provide space for funding components to increase the capacity of school residents, improve infrastructure, as well as increase school motivation. Stakeholders can utilise these findings to formulate more robust regulatory formulations for implementing SPAB in other KRB zones with similar typologies.


Keywords

safe school; SPAB; PSR; Merapi; evaluation; implementation; disaster; eruption.

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 4: Quality education

Metrics

Total abstract views: 347
Total article views: 441


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.