Original Research

Adaptive mechanisms to drought risk management in a KwaZulu-Natal community, South Africa

Vuyiswa Khumalo, Hloniphani Moyo, Lutendo Mugwedi, Johanes Belle
Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies | Vol 17, No 1 | a1757 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1757 | © 2025 Vuyiswa Khumalo, Hloniphani Moyo, Lutendo Mugwedi, Johanes Belle | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 July 2024 | Published: 15 April 2025

About the author(s)

Vuyiswa Khumalo, Disaster Management Training and Education Centre, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Hloniphani Moyo, Disaster Management Training and Education Centre, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa; and Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa
Lutendo Mugwedi, Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Agriculture, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa
Johanes Belle, Disaster Management Training and Education Centre, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Abstract

Households in developing countries have established various informal mechanisms to cope with unanticipated disasters such as droughts. Understanding these strategies in the context of climate change will enhance the design of locally applicable adaptation mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate a South African rural community’s adaptive mechanisms during- and ex-post-drought. Questionnaires were administered to 200 household heads, and five focus group discussions were held with selected community members. An index was computed to establish each adaptive mechanism’s importance (termed the rank order) relative to its use in the study area. During droughts, borrowing from neighbours was the most commonly used mechanism by households with no savings, while sharecropping was the second most used mechanism. Ex-post-droughts, using savings was the primary strategy for community members who had savings, followed by seeking employment as the second most used strategy.

Contribution: Findings from the study suggest that the community is highly vulnerable to droughts and disaster risks because of poor adaptive mechanisms, overreliance on water-dependent activities and lack of adequate support from different stakeholders. Community members use different mechanisms during- and ex-post-drought, depending on the stage or severity of the drought. The government and stakeholders should promote community awareness and early warning systems for droughts to mitigate disaster risks. These initiatives should ideally be combined with strengthening existing response measures and educating communities to adequately prepare for droughts and their aftermath.


Keywords

climate change; adaptive mechanisms; human outcomes; livelihoods; resilience; survival; sustainability

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 2: Zero hunger

Metrics

Total abstract views: 160
Total article views: 302


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.